The reality of consensus is that which is generally recognized as a consensus-based reality. Throughout history, this has also raised a social question about the effects of a society where not all human beings agree on the same reality. In societies where theoretic religions predominate, religious understanding of existence would be the reality of consensus, while religious belief would remain the non-consensual (or alternative) reality in a predominantly secular society, where consensual reality is based solely on science. We live in a world of agreement reality, it happens all the time around us. People who disagree with prevailing opinions often remain calm because of the spiral of silence. The reason for this theory, developed by the German political scientist Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann, is that if one opposes a well-received social agreement, one risks being thrown out of the campfire and eaten by wolves. “The reality of the agreement is the knowledge that has been gained because others tell you that`s the way it is.” I would have liked to have been aired and consent worked, and I moved away from those calls that felt better. The agreement creates and confirms positions and aerates neural trajectories. I left the reputation angry and dispossessed, planted in a clearly defined attitude. Whenever I feel good and someone else is wrong, the alarm bell sounds. There is no possibility if positions are set. A single drop of doubt can allow you to enter the room. Curiosity creates bridges between us.
I often hear people talking about what`s going on in their heads, as if their thoughts were a reality. I only did it the other day for over an hour. I knew what I was doing, and I stayed there because I had some free time. “An inactive mind is the devil`s playground.” “God, give me the serenity to accept things I can`t change, the courage to change what I can and the wisdom to see the difference.” If I discover what is in my power to move, I can create an action plan to make this attraction. If I am not prepared to take the necessary steps to feel better, I recognize it and pray or meditate for availability. The connotation of the term “consensus reality” is generally pejorative: it is generally used by idealistic, surrealist and other anti-realistic theorems who oppose or are hostile to this “reality”, with the consequence that this consensual reality is more or less created by those who live it. (The term “consensus reality” can be used more flexibly to refer to generally accepted beliefs.) However, there are those who use the term authorization for the practical benefits of all appointments on a common set of assumptions or experiences.  Materialists may not accept the idea that there are different realities for different people rather than different beliefs about a reality. For them, only the first use of the notion of reality would make sense. For them, someone who believes something else, where the facts were properly established, could be considered delusional. [Citation required] Children have sometimes been described as “inexperience[d] with a consensual reality although they are described as such, expecting their perspective to gradually approach the consensual reality of their society. Singers,  painters, writers, theorists and others who use a number of means of action have tried to oppose or undermine the reality of consensus, while others have said that they “ignore it”.
For example, by his paranoid-critical method, Salvador Dali intended to “systematize confusion through paranoia and an active thought process, thus helping both to completely discredit the world of reality.”  After a little circular time in my head, I called a friend on the pretext that I needed her opinion.